The Death Of Chevron Doesn’t Kill AI Regulation
In this article:
Supreme Court Decision Impacting AI Regulation:
- Case: Loper Bright Enterprises vs. Raimondo
- Decision: Overruled the 1984 precedent set by Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council.
- Chevron Doctrine: Previously required courts to defer to agency interpretation.
Implications for AI Regulation:
- Reduced Agency Power: Regulatory agencies now have less authority to interpret and enforce AI regulations without clear congressional directives.
- Victory for Anti-Regulation Advocates: Seen as a win for those concerned about the dangers of over-regulation stifling AI innovation.
- Setback for Pro-Regulation Advocates: A loss for those who support stronger governance to ensure safe and ethical AI development.
- Solution may be that Congress would explicitly define scope of authority granted to any AI agency
