July 23, 2024 The Death Of Chevron Doesn’t Kill AI Regulation AI Featured, AI Regulation, News In this article:Supreme Court Decision Impacting AI Regulation:Case: Loper Bright Enterprises vs. RaimondoDecision: Overruled the 1984 precedent set by Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council.Chevron Doctrine: Previously required courts to defer to agency interpretation.Implications for AI Regulation:Reduced Agency Power: Regulatory agencies now have less authority to interpret and enforce AI regulations without clear congressional directives.Victory for Anti-Regulation Advocates: Seen as a win for those concerned about the dangers of over-regulation stifling AI innovation.Setback for Pro-Regulation Advocates: A loss for those who support stronger governance to ensure safe and ethical AI development.Solution may be that Congress would explicitly define scope of authority granted to any AI agencyMore https://www.forbes.com/sites/johannacostigan/2024/07/22/the-death-of-chevron-hurts-but-wont-necessarily-kill-ai-regulation/More
AI Featured, AI Governance, AI Regulation, News What California lawmakers did to regulate artificial intelligence
AI Featured, AI Governance, AI Regulation, Benefits of AI, News, Responsible AI Navigating the EU AI Act: implications for regulated digital medical products